Oregon Court of Appeals holds cutoff time for negligent construction claims could be six years from discovery of a claim.2020-04-23T00:25:17+00:00
Oregon Court of Appeals holds cutoff time for negligent construction claims could be six years from discovery of a claim.

We spend a lot of effort on this blog talking about the time deadlines for property owners to sue contractors and design professionals for negligence.  There are two reasons for this:  first, the law on this is rapidly evolving in Oregon.  Second, it is of the utmost importance to contractors, design professionals, and property owners because there are very few absolute defenses to a claim for negligent construction besides the timing of claims.  Also, since many property owners rightfully loathe to dive into a lawsuit, they may delay filing until absolutely necessary.

The news keeps coming.  At the end of October, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided Riverview Condominium Association v. Cypress Ventures, Inc., et al., Case No A150586 (October 29, 2014).  There, the defendants developed testimony and documents evidencing that various types of water leaks had been affecting the property for several years.  The case discusses the “statute of repose” (the drop-dead deadline date for bringing any claims) as well as the “statute of limitations” (the time limit on bringing various claims).

The statute of limitations is the most interesting issue in the case because, over the last few years following the case Abraham v. T. Henry Construction, Inc., 350 Or 29 (2011), there has been discussion that property owners had to sue contractors within two years of “discovering” the claims against them.  This is not as clear as it sounds.  Buildings can fail slowly, over time.  What looks like window leaks here or there are subsequently compiled to look like “discovery” of a claim that the property owner should have sued on faster.

The Court in Riverview has held, for the first time clearly, that claims for negligent construction are governed by a six-year time limit and not a two-year time limit.  To arrive there, the Court extensively reviewed cases prior to Abraham, and demonstrated the logical connection of this rule to decades of other cases.  The Court further held that this six-year span runs from the date of “discovery” of a claim, and not completion of a project.

Riverview’s clarification in Oregon law, and the certainty this brings, is good news for both property owners and contractors.  Now, contractors will be able to plan their insurance and risk management programs accordingly, and property owners will not be rushed into lawsuits while they investigate issues affecting their properties.



Ball Janik LLP was founded in 1982 with six lawyers and a four-person support staff in Portland, Oregon. Since our firm’s inception, we have expanded our capabilities, our professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a firm focused in real property and land use (known then as Ball Janik & Novack), has grown to include the insights of a team of 30-plus attorneys, with a combined six centuries of experience, and capabilities including Real Estate and Land Use, Construction Defect, Commercial Litigation, Insurance Recovery, Construction and Design, Employment, Finance and Corporate, Public Agencies and Schools, and Community Associations. With offices in Florida and Oregon, our regional growth has earned us a national reputation for upholding the rights of our clients.

Ball Janik LLP has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Ball Janik LLP’s success and integrity have repeatedly made it one of “Oregon’s Most Admired Professional Firms,” according to the Portland Business Journal’s survey results of CEOs throughout the region.

Heather J. Oden
Oregon , Portland
No Blog Tiles found.