Deep In Repose: New Decision Clarifies Longstanding Confusion2020-04-23T00:25:14+00:00
03.03.2016 // CONSTRUCTION LAW WATCH
Deep In Repose: New Decision Clarifies Longstanding Confusion

Last month, the Oregon Supreme Court issued a decision with important implications for construction litigation. Ball Janik attorneys were heavily involved in the appeal to the Supreme Court.

In Shell v. The Schollander Companies, Inc., 358 Or 552 (2016), the court held that where a home is constructed without a contractual relationship between its builder and its first owner, the applicable statute of repose for negligent construction claims is ten years “from the date of the act or omission complained of.”

The fact that two statutes of repose are potentially applicable to Oregon construction defect litigation has for some time created uncertainty. ORS 12.115(1) says that “In no event shall any action for negligent injury to person or property of another be commenced more than 10 years from the date of the act or omission complained of.” ORS 12.135, by contrast, says that “An action … whether in contract, tort or otherwise, arising from the person having performed the construction, alteration or repair of any improvement to real property … must be commenced … [t]en years after substantial completion or abandonment of the construction, alteration or repair.”

While ORS 12.135 is a much more thorough and specific statute, and is narrowly addressed to the construction context (ORS 12.115, in its two terse paragraphs, does not use the word “construction”), the court determined that its text and legislative history require the conclusion that it applies only to construction completed with some contractual relationship between the builder and the first owner already in place. The court paid particular attention to the use of the word “contractee” in ORS 12.135’s definition of “substantial completion,” which is when that statute begins to run. ORS 12.135(4)(b) defines “substantial completion” as “the date when the contractee accepts in writing the construction, alteration or repair of the improvement to real property or any designated portion thereof as having reached that state of completion when it may be used or occupied for its intended purpose.” The court reasoned that because ORS 12.135 turns on “the date [the contractee accepts] the completed construction, alteration or repair,” or the “substantial completion” date, the statute assumes the existence of a contract that precedes or is coterminous with construction, and thus only applies in such contexts. Where construction proceeds with no contract in place between the builder and the first owner, and the builder sells the home after construction is finished, then ORS 12.115, the general statute of repose for negligence claims, applies.

Shell will likely add complexity to construction cases governed by ORS 12.115. Because that statute turns on “the date of the act or omission complained of,” and because construction projects often involve many parties and thus many “acts” and “omissions,” litigation that is subject to ORS 12.115 will require that litigants battle over the precise dates during construction on which each allegedly negligent “act” or “omission” occurred.

ABOUT BALL JANIK LLP

Ball Janik LLP was founded in 1982 with six lawyers and a four-person support staff in Portland, Oregon. Since our firm’s inception, we have expanded our capabilities, our professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a firm focused in real property and land use (known then as Ball Janik & Novack), has grown to include the insights of a team of 30-plus attorneys, with a combined six centuries of experience, and capabilities including Real Estate and Land Use, Construction Defect, Commercial Litigation, Insurance Recovery, Construction and Design, Employment, Finance and Corporate, Public Agencies and Schools, and Community Associations. With offices in Florida and Oregon, our regional growth has earned us a national reputation for upholding the rights of our clients.

Ball Janik LLP has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Ball Janik LLP’s success and integrity have repeatedly made it one of “Oregon’s Most Admired Professional Firms,” according to the Portland Business Journal’s survey results of CEOs throughout the region.

Heather J. Oden
Oregon , Portland
No Blog Tiles found.