Update: Insurer asks for reconsideration of opinion affirming insured’s attorney-fee award2021-06-21T20:42:56+00:00
06.15.2016 // THE POLICYHOLDER REPORT
Update: Insurer asks for reconsideration of opinion affirming insured’s attorney-fee award

Last week, I posted this article about the Ninth Circuit’s recent opinion affirming a $3.5 million attorney-fee award in favor of Schnitzer Steel against its insurer, Continental Casualty Co. Continental is unsatisfied with how it lost this battle, arguing in this petition for rehearing that the Ninth Circuit failed to adequately address Continental’s argument that Oregon’s fee-shifting statute in coverage cases doesn’t apply to losing insurers merely because the coverage lawsuit was filed in federal court.

It is Continental’s right to give this argument a shot. But what Oregon insureds should find troubling is Continental’s risibly misleading attempt to minimize what’s at stake here for insureds forced to spend many thousands (or even millions) of dollars forcing their insurers to pay what they promised. In support of its request that the Ninth Circuit reverse course, Continental argues that insurers really won’t be able to game the system by racing their insureds into the courthouse:

Finally, an insurer cannot defeat the insured’s choice of forum and right to fees by preemptively filing a declaratory relief action in federal court, because insureds—if correct on the merits of the declaration—remain free to seek any damages to which they may be entitled in a state court action.

This is precisely the peril that I worried about in my previous post, and I’m hopeful that the Ninth Circuit sees right through this soothing nonsense. An insured may be able to “seek any damages” caused by an insurer’s wrongful denial of a claim in a separate state-court lawsuit, but that misses the entire point of Oregon’s fee-shifting statute, which compensates insureds for their costs to fight a lawsuit in the first place. This “right to fees” in the initial coverage skirmish, apart from the merits and the “damages” owed to the insured, is exactly what Continental’s proposed rule would allow insurers to destroy under Continental’s self-serving interpretation of Oregon law intended to benefit insureds.

Oregon insureds, keep your fingers crossed.

 

ABOUT BALL JANIK LLP

Ball Janik LLP was founded in 1982 with six lawyers and a four-person support staff in Portland, Oregon. Since our firm’s inception, we have expanded our capabilities, our professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a firm focused in real property and land use (known then as Ball Janik & Novack), has grown to include the insights of a team of 30-plus attorneys, with a combined six centuries of experience, and capabilities including Real Estate and Land Use, Construction Defect, Commercial Litigation, Insurance Recovery, Construction and Design, Employment, Finance and Corporate, Public Agencies and Schools, and Community Associations. With offices in Florida and Oregon, our regional growth has earned us a national reputation for upholding the rights of our clients.

Ball Janik LLP has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Ball Janik LLP’s success and integrity have repeatedly made it one of “Oregon’s Most Admired Professional Firms,” according to the Portland Business Journal’s survey results of CEOs throughout the region.

No Blog Tiles found.